Duck and Cover |
Admittedly, Hollywood is not a center of profound intellectual thought.
It's been called the "dream capital of the world", and in a real sense
this is true. Like dreams, many of Hollywood's movies consist of plots
and dialogue that don't make much sense, and characters whose behavior
defies the principles of psychology as frequently as it breaks the rules
of physics. Some of them, like the dreary antiwar movies of the 1960s,
are blatantly political and manipulative. But some of them can only be
described as dangerous misinformation cynically disguised as entertainment.
One of the worst examples of dangerous misinformation was a movie released in 1982 called The Atomic Cafe, which made fun of the Government's disaster preparedness films for children about what to do in the event of a nuclear war. These films are the source of the famous "duck and cover" concept with which we have all become familiar. The idea of "duck and cover" seems quaint today, partly because it reminds us of a bygone era, and partly because it follows the general rule, first recognized by comedians, that anything containing the word 'duck' is intrinsically funny. (It shares this distinction with the word 'banana'). The "duck and cover" program, which was initiated in the days before H-bombs and ICBMs, was a reasonable course of civil defense at the time. However, the predominant motif in The Atomic Cafe was not one of amusement, but malicious ridicule. The movie was also devoid of factual information--or rather, the factual information was presented in such a way as to imply that it was false. The movie consisted entirely of old filmclips skillfully edited into a sort of video collage. Images of complete destruction at the epicenter of an explosion were juxtaposed with images of John and Jane Q. Public building fallout shelters, a kid named Tony jumping off his bicycle, and doctors trying to explain that nuclear fallout is survivable. These incongruities were designed to make the precautions appear absurd and to make the Government's information appear to be manipulative propaganda. However, the implication that the only possible outcome of a nuclear conflict would be a universal holocaust, in which everyone would die either from the blast, from radiation poisoning or fallout, or from starvation, making it pointless to take any precautions, is simply false. In fact, it's arguably the most dangerous nonsense imaginable. The genius of Hollywood is its ability to take a scientifically untenable position and play on people's natural fears to make their ideas seem plausible. With fiction, it sometimes works. But in a documentary, it's an example of how dangerously wrong the advice from technologically illiterate people can be. As film critic D. Boyle said of this movie, "There is nothing to temper the final impact of decadent cynicism, which both feeds the film and is fed by it. It is cynicism, and not skepticism, as Loader claims, that is the film's final message, and it may be as dangerous as fallout. If we cannot trust anyone, why should we begin by trusting these filmmakers." Worse, it encourages the defeatist attitude that a nuclear attack is not survivable, and that taking precautions is pointless. As one sympathetic reviewer said, "It seems laughable now, but people actually used to believe that atomic warfare was something that the earth could survive." The idea that a nuclear war would end all life on the planet has become very widespread. It is this sentiment that caused the students at Brown University in Rhode Island to demand a few years ago that the University administration stock cyanide capsules, so that the students could all commit suicide if a nuclear war broke out. Sensibly, the university denied their request. The students would just have to jump off a building like everyone else. The cold fact is, ducking and covering is excellent advice. Unfortunately, the nice people who gave me this nifty new jacket with the extra-long sleeves won't let me have my books on the design, construction, and effects of nuclear warheads, so I'll have to make do without divulging any quantitative facts about The Bomb. But in general terms, here are the facts you should know:
Nuclear weapons are complex machines whose workings can be easily disrupted, and in the future, scientists will undoubtedly find ways to put into practice the ways that are already theoretically available for reducing their effectiveness as weapons. But for the moment limited nuclear warfare is as real a possibility as it was in the 1950s. In those days, little was known about the magnitude of the risks of cancer and other medical consequences of radiation. It is easy enough to ridicule their lack of knowledge. The images of soldiers courageously advancing over fallout-covered terrain are scary. But in those days, people were expected to take personal risks to preserve Western civilization. And they did. That's a concept many in this country would do well to reacquaint themselves with. Instead, many people have a hysterical fear of any type of danger, and especially of radioactivity, because they can't comprehend the vast differences in magnitude of various radiation sources, such as cosmic rays, medical X-rays, or nuclear explosions. One anti-nuclear activist from Australia makes a career of spreading misinformation about radiation--and she even has a medical degree. I've worked with one biologist, who somehow passed our radiation safety course, who even refused to let people work with radioactive tritium in the same room, for fear of radiation exposure (no, this was not the same guy who was also afraid of our sonicator bath). Of course, the risk of radiation-induced injury from being six feet away from 100 microcuries of tritium is ... let me see ... clickety-click ... approximately ... zero. But if a guy with a Ph.D. in biology knows so little about the hazards of radioactivity, what chance do the rest of us have? The only defense against cynicism, technological illiteracy, and fear is knowledge. Understanding technology is the best way to avoid being taken in by propaganda flicks like The Atomic Cafe. If the idea of increasing your chances of survival is not reason enough, consider that the brain uses 20% of the body's oxygen just while resting. By exercising your brain, you will burn calories. You can lose weight and become a knowledgeable citizen at the same time. And if you see a flash, go ahead and duck. Slim, knowledgeable, and maybe still alive--what a combination. Atta boy, Tony. |