The social dynamic of scientific journals, like that of the news media, is structurally biased to favor dramatic stories about the impending end of the world in a fiery inferno of global warming. But why are respected journals like Nature and less-respected (but still more or less popular) non-scientific magazines like Scientific American so unskeptical about bad climate science? Michaels has a lucid and reasonable explanation that will have any scientist nodding sadly in agreement. Although global warming is a highly political issue, Michaels avoids polemics and concentrates on presenting the scientific facts about global warming in a style readily accessible to the layman.
Meltdown is a highly readable book that shows how the concept of catastrophic global warming conflicts with the empirical evidence, and why the general public has been kept out in the cold. There is so much of this evidence that the book doesn't even mention two recent discoveries that have effectively shattered the global warming myth. The first of these was a recent article in Energy and Environment concerning the famous "hockey stick" graph. This graph, which played a prominent role in the IPCC reports, purported to show dramatic temperature increases starting in the 20th century. The Energy and Environment article demonstrated that the hockey stick graph was wildly inaccurate and--worst of all--suggested that the authors of the hockey stick knew this when they created it.
The second discovery was the finding that solar flux has been gradually increasing over the past century. This finding casts into doubt the attribution of any temperature increases to human factors. Despite the best efforts of environmentalists and the news media to ignore these findings, the general public is gradually starting to realize that the ice under the global warming theory is very thin indeed.
Michaels points out that since the end of the 1930-1975 cooling period, the surface temperature has begun to slightly increase, at the glacial rate of 1-2°C per century. Contrary to what many people believe, however, there is no consensus among climatologists as to the cause of this increase. And as Michaels points out, the predictions of mass extinctions, heat deaths, flooding, droughts, supertornadoes, rampaging butterflies and malaria-carrying mosquitoes, and dramatic temperature changes are mostly Hollywood-style hype. Some activists have even predicted impossibilities like Siberia-like temperatures in England and 120 degree heat indexes in the southeast United States. The cold fact is that because 95% of the so-called greenhouse effect is caused by water, any global warming will be largely confined to those regions lacking atmospheric water vapor--that is, deserts and cold areas like Siberia. And despite the gloom and doom predictions from the media, and the sometimes laughably improbable predictions of climate models and environmental activists, even these changes will be way too small to melt the icecaps.
Using a writing style that is a little livelier than his first book, Satanic Gases, Michaels systematically debunks the inaccurate and biased reporting on climate from media giants like the New York Times and Washington Post. He points out that, despite the hype, the sea level around the island of Tuvalu is falling, not rising. Greenland and Antarctica are not melting, but actually getting colder. Penguins are not becoming endangered. Nature has always had periods of warming and cooling, and penguins have somehow managed to survive. Climatologists are starting to realize that unless they can reach the public with the truth, the only thing that will ultimately melt away is the respect of the populace and with it, as the paradigm of "global warming" is overthrown, their own funding.